The taxpayer company appealed against the disallowance by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) of capital allowances on the cost of constructing a building (described by the company as a ‘valeting bay’) as plant or machinery. The taxpayer supplied Renault cars, and needed to valet cars as part of its activities. This included a process of applying a finish (‘glasscoat’) to new cars at specified temperatures.
The valet building consisted of a concrete floor, walls of standard concrete block construction, and a flat roof set on wooden beams. The walls were insulated, the floor was raised, and the building had six wall-fixed heaters to provide the optimal temperatures for the glasscoat process. Planning permission had been given for a “double garage and retaining brick wall.”
The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) noted there was nothing to show that there was “anything so unique” about the building
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial
, 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe