This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Challenge To HMRC Contract Settlement Was Outside First-Tier Tribunal Jurisdiction

By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014
An appeal seeking to challenge a property valuation giving rise to a capital gains tax liability following a contract settlement was struck out, as the First-tier Tribunal did not have the necessary jurisdiction in relation to contract settlements.

An individual died in January 2005. He left his estate on trust for his four sisters, including the first appellant. The estate included a farm, which was valued upon death for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes at £650,000. No IHT was payable as the estate was below the nil rate band after taking into account agricultural property relief. In or about March 2006, the farm was sold by public auction for £800,000. 

In July 2009, the second appellant submitted an estate return to HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) claiming capital losses of some £18,000, on the basis of a claim under IHTA 1984, s 191 that the sale proceeds be substituted for the probate value on death.<>
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Application for new grounds of appeal accepted in relation to a trustee’s potential liability to trust’s capital gains tax
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2019
Penalties For Late Filing Of Non-Resident CGT Return Discharged
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2018
Insufficiency Of Funds Due To Escrow Arrangements Was A Reasonable Excuse For Late Payment
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2018
Penalty Reduced As No Reasonable Prospect Of Capital Loss Being Used In Full
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2017
Professional Advisers’ Failings Were Reasonable Excuse For Late Payment
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2015