This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Company Limited By Guarantee Was Controlled But Not Qualifying Subsidiary Of Issuing Company

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2018
A company limited by guarantee was controlled by the company issuing shares for enterprise investment scheme purposes and was a subsidiary of the issuing company but not a qualifying subsidiary.

The appellant was incorporated in February 2015 as the parent company of a group. It owned 100% of the shares in a company (HPG), which in turn owned 100% of the shares in another company (HFL). In April 2015, the appellant issued shares to investors, which it was hoped would qualify for enterprise investment scheme (EIS) relief. 

On 1 May 2015, HFL acquired the entire shareholding of GNF. At the same time, HFL became the sole member of GNMA, a company limited by guarantee (which was a vehicle for holding client funds and had no intrinsic value of its own). On 6 May 2015, the appellant issued further shares to investors, which it again hoped would qualify for EIS relief.

The appellant submitted forms EIS1 to
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Film production company satisfied the risk to capital condition
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2022
Preferential Right Disqualified Shares From EIS Relief
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2016
Preferential Share Rights Could Not Be Ignored
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2016
Relief Withdrawn After Company Became A 51% Subsidiary
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2015