This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Condition For Change Of Accounting Date Was Not Met

By Mark McLaughlin, November 2016
The taxpayer failed to meet all the criteria for a valid change of accounting date, because he did not have accounts with an accounting period no longer than 18 months to the new accounting date at the time he notified the change. 

The appellant had an annual accounting date of 31 July. In 2009/10, he decided on advice to change his accounting date to 5 April, and so bring into account in that tax year income earned in the period 1 August 2008 to 5 April 2010 (i.e. a 20 month, rather than a 12 month, basis period in 2009/10). 

It was advantageous to bring forward the appellant’s liability to tax on eight months’ income (which, if he had not changed accounting date, would have been subject to tax in 2010/11), because a new top rate of 50% took effect in 2010/11, whereas 2009/10 was the last year where the top rate remained at 40%. Therefore, if the change in accounting date was effective, this would result in
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Qualified Diver Was Self-Employed For Income Tax Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2019
Losses- No Sideways Loss Relief As Trade Was Not Commercial
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2016
Vessel Chartering Trade Was Not Carried On Commercially Or With A View To The Realisation Of Profits
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2016
Taxpayer Could Not Account For Invoices On Receipts Basis
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2016
Loan Interest Relief Not Due As Borrowings Were Not Used Wholly For Trade Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2015