This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Conditions For Discovery Assessment Were Not Satisfied

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2018
A discovery assessment in respect of an excessive claim in the appellant’s tax return for double tax relief was invalid, as an HMRC officer could have been reasonably expected to be aware that the claim was excessive, and HMRC had not demonstrated that the appellant’s accountants failed to take reasonable care.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) opened an enquiry into the appellant’s tax return for 2013/14 and found that tax relief claimed in respect of French and Canadian dividends exceeded the amounts permitted under the terms of the relevant double tax treaties.

HMRC’s enquiry into the appellant’s tax return for 2013/14 led them to check his return for 2012/13, where the same error was detected. A discovery assessment for 2012/13 was issued in January 2016. The appellant appealed. The dispute between the parties related to whether either or both of the discovery conditions in TMA 1970, s 29(4) or (5)
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Discovery assessments were not made to HMRC’s best judgment
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2019
Taxpayer’s Reliance On Accountant Was Not Reasonable Excuse For Late Tax Return
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2018
Executor Not Liable To Penalties For Late Filing Of Estate Tax Returns
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2017
Tax Return Errors By Taxpayer’s Accountants Were Not A Reasonable Excuse For Late Payment Penalty Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2017
HMRC’s Decision To Refuse Special Relief Claim Was Unreasonable
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2015