This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Consideration For Assets Was Not Given ‘Wholly And Exclusively’ For Their Acquisition

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2015
Summary

The consideration for assets in an artificial scheme to create an allowable loss was not ‘wholly and exclusively’ given for the acquisition of the assets (within TCGA 1992, s 38(1)(a)), on the basis of the Ramsay approach to the application of the tax legislation to transactions forming part of a larger whole.

Background

The appellants entered into an artificial tax avoidance scheme, which was designed to create capital losses that could be offset against taxable income. 

The scheme was complex, but in essence its success depended on the participants having spent large sums on acquiring assets, and realising very small disposal proceeds, thereby generating a large loss for capital gains tax purposes. For example, one appellant (M) claimed to have spent over £6 million on acquiring certain shares pursuant to an option. The shares, which
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Taxpayers Could Not Claim As Enhancement Expenditure Property Development Costs Incurred By Their Company
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2018
Receiver’s Fees And Legal Fees Were Not Deductible Expenses
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2017
HMRC Could Resile From Previously Expressed View On The Availability Of Losses
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2017
Payment For Release From Undertakings Was Not An Allowable Deduction On A Disposal Of Shares
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2015
Debt Forgiveness Constituted Non-Cash Consideration For Disposal Of Shares
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2015