This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Earlier Enterprise Investment Scheme Application Submitted In Error Could Not Be Substituted

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2018
A company that mistakenly submitted to HMRC a compliance statement for the enterprise investment scheme instead of the seed enterprise investment scheme could not make a substitute claim under the latter scheme to correct the error.

In June 2014, the appellant’s advisers wrote to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) requesting advance assurance for seed enterprise investment scheme (SEIS) purposes. In July 2014, HMRC provided the advance assurance that it would be able to authorise the company to issue compliance certificates in respect of shares to be issued, following the receipt of a satisfactorily completed form SEIS1. 

On 20 July 2015, the appellant sent a compliance statement to HMRC on form EIS1 (relating to the enterprise investment scheme (EIS)). The appellant had intended submitting a compliance statement for SEIS purposes (on form SEIS1), but the wrong form was used in error. HMRC subsequently issued an authority
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Form EIS1 form used in error and submitted to HMRC could be treated as form SEIS1
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2021
Earlier Enterprise Investment Scheme Application Submitted By Mistake Could Not Be Replaced
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2017
Earlier Enterprise Investment Scheme Application Could Not Be Withdrawn
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2016