This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Employer Failed To Take Reasonable Care To Comply With PAYE Regulations

By Mark McLaughlin, November 2015
The appellant employed an individual whose PAYE tax coding was lowered during the tax year 2011/12. When the lower tax coding was input into the appellant’s payroll computer, it resulted for the relevant pay period (week 26) in the cumulative tax due exceeding the salary which the employee was due to receive for that period.

The payroll computer had been set up to operate, in those circumstances, so that no tax was deducted from employees’ pay. Consequently, not only was no tax deducted from the employee’s pay for week 26, but no tax was deducted at all for weeks 26 to 52. In addition, the payroll computer generated an ‘exception report’ identifying the employee with the entry “insufficient pay for tax”.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) subsequently reviewed the employee’s tax liabilities, and discovered a tax underpayment resulting from under-deductions made by the appellant under the
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Company directors were liable for tax not paid by company
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2020
HMRC’s Decision To Require Security For PAYE And NIC Liabilities Was Reasonable
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2018
Sole Director Shareholder Was Liable For Company’s PAYE And NIC Debts
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2018
PAYE: Security Was Required For PAYE And NIC But For Reduced Amount
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2016
Tribunal Had No Jurisdiction To Consider HMRC’s Refusal To Refuse ESC A19 Claim
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2015