This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Livery Business Was Not Wholly Or Mainly An Investment Business

By Mark McLaughlin, December 2017
A livery business was held to be a business which was not wholly or mainly one of holding investments and was therefore eligible for business property relief.
 
Summary
 
A livery business was held to be a business which was not wholly or mainly one of holding investments (within IHTA 1984, s 105(3)) and was therefore eligible for inheritance tax (IHT) business property relief (BPR).
 
Background
 
At the time of the deceased’s death in May 2012, she was the sole owner of approximately 30 acres of land. Following her husband’s death in 2005, the deceased took over the running of what, at that time, was a DIY livery business. That business came to an end sometime in 2005, when the entire land was let out. In 2008, the tenant or licensee agreed to manage the livery business, which the deceased then decided
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Livery Business Was Not Wholly Or Mainly An Investment Business
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2019
Business Premises Lease Liability Was Deductible From Value Of Business
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2018
Holiday Cottage Lettings Business Was Mainly One Of Making Or Holding Investments
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2017
Furnished Holiday Lettings Business Was Mainly Of Making Or Holding Investments
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2015