This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Payroll Was Not An Accountancy Service Requiring Money Laundering Registration

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2015
A payroll company was not an ‘accountancy service provider’, and an appeal against a penalty for late registration with HMRC for money laundering purposes was therefore allowed.

The appellant payroll company appealed against a penalty for a breach of the Money Laundering Regulations 2007, on the basis that it failed to register with HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) as an ‘accountancy services provider’ (ASP). The payroll company appealed.

HMRC had written to the appellant, advising that if a payroll service was being provided they may be operating as an ASP, and if so they would need to be registered for money laundering purposes unless supervised by a specified professional body (which they were not). Following a dispute about the need for registration, the appellant registered under protest, simply to avoid further debate.

Subsequently, HMRC notified the appellant that
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Application for a tax return enquiry partial closure notice dismissed
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2019
Condition For An Information Notice Following Submission Of Partnership Tax Return Was Met
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2018
HMRC Failed To Address Why Partnership Tax Return Was Submitted Late
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2017
HMRC Breached Its Duty Of Confidentiality To Taxpayers
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2017
Penalties For Incorrect Tax Returns: Appropriate Level Of Penalty Abatement Was 50%
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2016