This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Penalty Appeal Allowed As Notice Was Too Uncertain

By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014
An appeal against penalties for non-compliance with an information notice was allowed due to the notice being vague and unlimited in point of time.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) stated to the appellant that information was held indicating that he had traded as a financial adviser prior to January 2010, and sought information about it. The appellant did not reply, and HMRC issued an information notice to him (under FA 2008, Sch 36, para 1). 

The information notice demanded: “Full details of your income as a financial advisor from the date you commenced to 31 December 2009; Details of payments made to workers from the date you commenced as a financial advisor to 31 December 2009; The names and addresses of any workers you engaged from when you commenced in business to 31 December 2009.” The appellant did not provide any information in response to the notice, and appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) after HMRC
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tax-Related Penalty Reduced
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2018
Appeal Partly Relating To Statutory Records Struck Out
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2017
Tax Geared Penalty Imposed At 100%
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2015
Bank Account Details Were ‘Reasonably Required’
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2014
Compliance – HMRC Information Notice: Appointment Diary Not ‘Reasonably Required'
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2014