This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Reliance On Professional Advice Was Not Careless

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2017
The appellants took reasonable care in relying on professional advice, which was subsequently found to be incorrect.

The appellants owned a property (ST), which was let to tenants until June 2010. The property was put up for sale, and contracts were exchanged on 25 May 2010. Completion took place on 23 July 2010.

The appellants moved into ST on 29 June 2010, and resided there until 22 July 2010. On the advice of their accountants at the time, the appellants executed a principal private residence election for capital gains tax (CGT) purposes on 23 April 2012, to the effect that ST was their principal private residence until 22 July 2010. By an election signed on the same date, the appellants elected another property (FR) as their principal private residence from 30 June 2010. The appellants subsequently filed tax returns in which they each declared their appropriate capital gains on the property disposal, as reduced by private
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Discovery Conditions Were Met Following Property Disposal
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2018
Appeal Against Penalties For Late Filing Of Non-Resident CGT Returns Dismissed
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2018
Negligible Value Claim Was Validly Made
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2017
Discovery Assessment Requirements Were Not Satisfied
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2017
HMRC Enquiry Out Of Time As Notice Was Delivered Too Late
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2015