This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Reliance On Professional Advice Was Not Careless

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2017
The appellants took reasonable care in relying on professional advice, which was subsequently found to be incorrect.

The appellants owned a property (ST), which was let to tenants until June 2010. The property was put up for sale, and contracts were exchanged on 25 May 2010. Completion took place on 23 July 2010.

The appellants moved into ST on 29 June 2010, and resided there until 22 July 2010. On the advice of their accountants at the time, the appellants executed a principal private residence election for capital gains tax (CGT) purposes on 23 April 2012, to the effect that ST was their principal private residence until 22 July 2010. By an election signed on the same date, the appellants elected another property (FR) as their principal private residence from 30 June 2010. The appellants subsequently filed tax returns in which they each declared their appropriate capital gains on the property disposal, as reduced by private
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Application for new grounds of appeal accepted in relation to a trustee’s potential liability to trust’s capital gains tax
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2019
Penalties For Late Filing Of Non-Resident CGT Return Cancelled
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2018
Property Was A Capital Asset Throughout Period Of Ownership
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2016
Professional Advisers’ Failings Were Reasonable Excuse For Late Payment
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2015
Challenge To HMRC Contract Settlement Was Outside First-Tier Tribunal Jurisdiction
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014