A company could not validly surrender group relief as it had ceased to be a member of the same group as the claimant company for group relief purposes upon the appointment of receivers of the surrendering company.
The appellants (‘Farnborough’) appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) against decisions by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to disallow Farnborough’s claims for group relief (under CTA 2010, s 154) of some £10.5 million from Piccadilly Hotels 2 Limited (PH2L) for the accounting period ending 31 May 2012. Farnborough and PH2L were both at least 75% subsidiaries of another company (KL) for the purposes of CTA 2010, s 152.
The FTT held ([2016] UKFTT 431) that PH2L ceased to be a member of the same group of companies as Farnborough in the relevant accounting period because (under s 154) the appointment of a receiver over PH2L constituted arrangements, which had the effect that the
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial
, 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe