This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Sideways Loss Relief Not Available As LLP Trades Failed Commerciality Test

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2017
‘Sideways’ loss relief against other income was not available to individual members of ‘Icebreaker’ film partnerships, as the LLP trades were not carried on on a commercial basis and with a view to profit. 

An appeal was made by a number of individuals against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) in relation to the ‘Icebreaker’ film partnerships (Acornwood LLP v Revenue and Customs [2014] UKFTT 416 (TC)). The appeal raised ‘member level’ issues, which affected the question whether the individual members of the relevant limited liability partnerships (LLPs) could obtain ‘sideways’ loss relief (i.e. offset the individual share of their LLP’s trading losses against other income) for income tax purposes.

The FTT had allowed the LLPs’ appeals to a limited extent, and the losses which they did allow to the four LLPs involved would ultimately amount to
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Discovery Assessment Valid And Relief For Footballer Development Activity Losses Not Allowable
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2018
LLP Was Carrying On Trade But Not On Commercial Basis Or With A View To Realisation Of Profits
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2017
‘Icebreaker Partnerships’ Appeals Dismissed
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2016
Relief For Footballer Development Activity Losses Was Not Allowable
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2016
Two LLPs Were Trading But A Third LLP Was Not
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2016