This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Taxpayer Explanations Were Reasonably Required

By Mark McLaughlin, July 2016
An appeal against a penalty for non-compliance with an information notice was dismissed, as statutory records and an explanation why certain records were no longer in the company’s possession were reasonably required by HMRC.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) opened an enquiry into the appellant’s corporation tax return for its accounting period ended 31 March 2013. Some business records were supplied, but the appellant made a declaration that its sales invoices and computer backup data for that period were not in its possession.

HMRC issued an information notice (under FA 2008, Sch 36, para 1), requesting an explanation as to why those two items were no longer in the appellant’s possession. Subsequently, HMRC issued a penalty for failing to comply with the information notice. The appellant appealed.

It was submitted for the appellant that (under FA 2008, Sch 36, para 18) an information
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tribunal Hearing For Approval Of Third-Party Notices Could Not Include Companies And Individuals
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2019
Information Notice Requiring Production Of Documents By Post Or Email Was Valid
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2016