This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Workers Were Not All Subcontractors

By Mark McLaughlin, April 2016
Payments by a contractor to certain workers were not made to subcontractors for construction industry scheme purposes, due to the nature of the relationship between the parties. 

The appellant, a self-employed bathroom fitter, undertook work for property owners. He did not charge a mark-up on goods and materials he supplied to his customers as part of his work.

Between 2010 and 2013, the appellant paid other parties for construction work done at sites where he was working. Those parties invoiced the appellant for their work, and the appellant received from the client for whom he was working an equal sum; the appellant made no markup (in the same way as for goods and materials).

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) subsequently raised a determination that the appellant was liable to pay tax under the construction industry scheme (CIS) on payments to the other workers, together with penalties for
Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tribunal erred in allowing appeal against HMRC’s withdrawal of gross payment status
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2022
Shadow director did not disqualify company from CIS gross payment status
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2022
Company Had A Reasonable Excuse For The Late Filing Of CIS Returns
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2018
Company Failed To Take Reasonable Care To Comply
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2017
Penalties Reduced For Late Filing Of Returns
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2015