This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Agents were acting on the taxpayer’s behalf despite submitting tax returns without the taxpayer approving them

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2025

Agents who submitted incorrect expenses claims without the taxpayer having approved the tax returns were acting on the taxpayer’s behalf, and the agents acted deliberately in submitting tax returns containing the excessive and unallowable expenses claims. 

The appellant was a driver for couriers, UPS. Several of his colleagues had previously been approached by a company (Apostle), which offered to obtain ‘tax rebates’ relating to the cleaning of uniforms and subsistence expenses. The colleagues successfully received payments of around £3,000 each. The appellant approached Apostle and asked them to check whether he was due a tax rebate.  

Subsequently, Apostle sent ‘calculations’ to the appellant. He approved the tax amount shown as due to him. Apostle did not send tax returns to the appellant for approval. On 20 November 2020, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) received tax returns for the appellant for/

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Company payment to employee benefit trust and subsequent loan did not constitute earnings of director and shareholder
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2026
Appeal struck out due to repeated non-compliance by taxpayer’s accountant
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2024
No requirement for tribunal to consider effects of company being in liquidation
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2023
Social media posts by a furloughed employee constituted work
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2023
Dividends credited to directors’ loan accounts were backdated
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2023