This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Application for a preliminary hearing about the appellant’s domicile was dismissed.

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023

The First-tier Tribunal refused the taxpayer’s application for the issue of his domicile to be determined at a preliminary hearing.  

On 29 March 2021, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued a discovery assessment in respect of the tax year 2013/14 (under the extended assessment timeframe in F(No 2)A 2017, Sch 18). The assessment was made on the basis that the appellant had acquired a domicile of choice within the UK by 2013/14 and was not eligible to be taxed on the remittance basis. The amount assessed was made on a ‘best judgment’ footing as the appellant had not provided HMRC with any details relating to his non-UK income. The appellant appealed against the assessment on the grounds that: (a) he had not acquired a domicile of choice within the UK; and (b) even if he had, the amount assessed (£9,924,960) was excessive because his overseas income in that year was approximately £50,000. 

On 1 March 2019, HMRC

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Compensation received due to mis-selling of interest rate hedging products was taxable income
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
HMRC was not required to notify liability to a charge
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2025
Company share buyback proceeds were an income distribution
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2021
HMRC had the right to ask questions in an informal investigation
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020
Winnings from gambling activities were not taxable
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2020