This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

ATED: Insufficient evidence of a property development trade for relief claim

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2019

The appellant’s appeal against HMRC’s refusal to allow ATED relief for a property interest held in the course of a property development trade was dismissed as there was insufficient evidence to establish that the appellant was carrying on such a trade.

The appellant purchased a residential property in 1993 for £1.25 million. In the period between that purchase and 2007: (a) the property was occupied from time to time by persons permitted to do so by the appellant’s directors; and (b) certain features were added to the property. From 2008, the use of the property declined; from then until the commencement of works on the property in April 2016, it was occupied solely by domestic staff. The appellant decided to sell the property in 2011 and it was placed on the market at an asking price of £13.5 million.

In the absence of anyone willing to buy the

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Rollover Relief Not Due Upon Disposal Of Dwelling Built On Farm
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2018
Horse Breeding Was Not A Trading Activity
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2015