This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Builder’s disposals of three residences were not part of a trading activity

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2024

Three properties were not purchased with a view to disposal at a profit in short order after significant work was carried out but were purchased to be a home for the appellant’s family and sold when circumstances changed, such that the transactions were not trading in nature, and principal private residence relief applied to each disposal.   

Summary 

Three properties were not purchased with a view to disposal at a profit in short order after significant work was carried out but were purchased to be a home for the appellant’s family and sold when circumstances changed, such that the transactions were not trading in nature, and principal private residence (PPR) relief applied to each disposal. 

Background 

The appellant sold three residential properties: (1) ‘Ringmer’ – purchased in November 2008 as two flats for £760,000 and sold as a

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Loan notes were not registered in Jersey upon their redemption
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2026
Payment to taxpayer for transfer of beneficial interest in distribution rights was a taxable disposal
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2024
Share exchange did not form part of arrangements with a main purpose of CGT avoidance
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2023
Company was not shareholder’s ‘personal company’ for relief purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020
Transfer to connected party was a ‘disposal’ and there was no bare trust or implied trust
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020