This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Company did not satisfy the commercial trading or risk to capital requirements

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2022

The appellant company’s appeal against HMRC’s refusal to authorise the issue of EIS compliance certificates was dismissed, as the company’s trade was not conducted on a commercial basis with a view to profit and the ‘risk to capital’ condition was not met.

The appellant company (Pip) applied to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for authority to issue compliance certificates under the enterprise investment scheme (EIS) to shareholders relating to various tranches of shares issued between 17 May 2018 and 14 November 2018.

HMRC refused Pip authority to issue the compliance certificates. HMRC considered that Pip failed to meet EIS requirements. In particular: Pip failed to meet the ‘risk to capital’ condition; it was carrying out ‘excluded activities’; and it had engaged in prohibited investment activity. Pip appealed.

Pip argued that it carried on a trade, being the creation, development,

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

One insufficiency in assessment relating to different errors did not validate the whole assessment for conduct and time limit purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2026
Loans paid to taxpayer as part of contractor loan scheme were taxable as employment income
By Andrew Needham, April 2026
The First-tier Tribunal made errors of law in deciding that IR35 did not apply
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2024
Non-arrival of HMRC ‘nudge’ letters was not a reasonable excuse for late notification
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2023
Dividends credited to directors’ loan accounts were backdated
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2023