This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Company was not the taxpayer’s personal company as ‘issued share capital’ condition not met

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2019

The taxpayer’s claim for entrepreneurs’ relief failed as the requirement to hold at least 5% of the company’s issued share capital meant at least 5% of the total nominal value of the company’s share capital. 
 
Summary 
 
The taxpayer’s claim for entrepreneurs’ relief (ER) failed, as the requirement to hold at least 5% of the company’s issued share capital meant at least 5% of the total nominal value of the company’s share capital. 
 
Background 
 
The taxpayer was approached and agreed to invest in a company (FGL). At that time, FGL’s issued share capital was divided into shares with a £1 nominal value. FGL’s lawyers advised that he subscribe for shares with a 10p nominal value, as this would be more straightforward than obtaining the permission of existing

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Individuals were not required to be settlement beneficiaries for a one-year period
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2019
Entrepreneurs’ Relief: Shareholder Remained an Employee Despite Removal From Payroll
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2014
Entrepreneurs’ Relief Due On Property Disposal Following Cessation Of Trade
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2014