This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Condition For Change Of Accounting Date Was Not Met

By Mark McLaughlin, April 2019

The taxpayer failed to meet all the criteria for a valid change of accounting date because the accounts of the business were for a 20-month period, and therefore the ‘18-month test’ condition was not satisfied.  

The appellant had an annual accounting date of 31 July. In 2009/10, he decided on advice to change his accounting date to 5 April, and so bring into account in that tax year income earned in the period 1 August 2008 to 5 April 2010 (i.e. a 20 month, rather than a ‘12 month’, basis period in 2009/10). This would have been to his advantage because a new higher rate of tax was introduced for the following tax year. 

However, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) did not accept that the appellant had effected a change in his accounting date. The dispute concerned whether or not the conditions (in ITTOIA 2005, s 217) for a valid change of

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Diver treated as trading for some periods of employment
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2020
Agent and webmaster expenses claims by adult entertainer denied
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2019
Sideways Loss Relief Available As Trade Was Commercial
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2018
Accommodation Costs Were Not Wholly And Exclusively Incurred By Actor
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2015
Partnership Ceased Farming Trade For Three Year Period For Loss Relief Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2014