This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Condition For Change Of Accounting Date Was Not Met

By Mark McLaughlin, April 2019

The taxpayer failed to meet all the criteria for a valid change of accounting date because the accounts of the business were for a 20-month period, and therefore the ‘18-month test’ condition was not satisfied.  

The appellant had an annual accounting date of 31 July. In 2009/10, he decided on advice to change his accounting date to 5 April, and so bring into account in that tax year income earned in the period 1 August 2008 to 5 April 2010 (i.e. a 20 month, rather than a ‘12 month’, basis period in 2009/10). This would have been to his advantage because a new higher rate of tax was introduced for the following tax year. 

However, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) did not accept that the appellant had effected a change in his accounting date. The dispute concerned whether or not the conditions (in ITTOIA 2005, s 217) for a valid change of

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Sideways relief for farming losses denied on HMRC appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020
Travel Expenses Of Exotic Dancer Not Deductible But Other Expenses Allowable
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2018
Son’s Wages Were Not A Deductible Business Expense
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2018
Condition For Change Of Accounting Date Was Not Met
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2016
Trade Started When It Was Set Up And Ready For Customers
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2016