This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Did the appellant have a reasonable excuse for submitting the appeal late?

By Andrew Needham, January 2025

Summary 

The appellant applied for permission to bring a late appeal against an assessment for £103,009 of VAT, plus interest. The dispute arose in the context of the long-running Rank Group litigation concerning the VAT treatment of gaming machines. This litigation included a judgment of the Supreme Court, which was released in July 2015 (HMRC v Rank Group plc [2015] UKSC 48). 

Background 

The appellant first made a claim for overpaid VAT in 2006. Reflecting the different stages of the Rank Group litigation, HMRC first refused the claim, then (in 2013) paid the amount claimed. At the same time as making this payment, HMRC issued a ‘protective assessment’ that was intended to enable them to recover that sum if the Rank Group litigation went in HMRC's favour in the higher courts. 

The appellant repaid the disputed VAT to HMRC in 2014, following the Court of Appeal'

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was the error ‘careless’ or ‘deliberate’?
By Andrew Needham, May 2023
Was the appellant making exempt supplies of insurance?
By Andrew Needham, January 2021
Was the separate hire of a car seat a separate supply from the hire of the car?
By Andrew Needham, September 2020
Did the appellant under-declare the output tax on sales of fuel and was the assessment made to best judgement?
By Andrew Needham, May 2020
Were HMRC Unreasonable To Refuse A Belated Notification?
By Andrew Needham, October 2018