This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Did the construction of a standalone extension qualify as the construction of a new residential property?

By Andrew Needham, April 2023

This was an appeal against HMRC’s refusal of a claim for a refund of VAT under the DIY House Builders Scheme. HMRC contended that the planning permission was for an extension of the existing building and not for a separate dwelling.  

In July 2019, a Building Control Completion Certificate was issued, which described the relevant works as “construction of a single-storey extension to the rear” of the property connected by a corridor. An informal amendment to the planning permission removed the connecting corridor leaving it as a standalone extension consisting of two bedrooms, a kitchen, and a living room. The appellant moved from the main house and took up residence in the extension while one of his children occupied the main residence. 

The appellant’s evidence was, in summary, that although the initial plan had been for the rear extension to be attached to the existing property, the plans were changed so that it

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Was there a reasonable excuse for the submission of two late VAT returns and payments?
By Andrew Needham, May 2025
Was the description of the services provided sufficient to fulfil the legal requirements?
By Andrew Needham, July 2024
Was the appellant entitled to repayment supplement on sums subject to an offset agreement?
By Andrew Needham, November 2021
Was bad debt relief available on historic bad debts?
By Andrew Needham, May 2021
Education exemption: Was a profit-making education business a college of a university?
By Andrew Needham, July 2019