This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Discovery assessment amount was confusing but found to have been calculated correctly

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2025

The amount of a discovery assessment involving the high-income child benefit charge was difficult for HMRC to break down and explain, but it correctly represented the insufficiency of tax in the taxpayer’s self-assessment return.  

The appellant claimed child benefit for her children for many years. She had been unaware of the concept of the high-income child benefit charge (HICBC) until October 2019, when HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) wrote to her about it. The appellant subsequently filed a tax return for 2017/18, showing tax due attributable to the HICBC.  

The appellant was made redundant in 2018/19. She contacted HMRC as she thought she might have overpaid tax as a result. HMRC agreed and issued a refund of £8,630.92. The appellant subsequently submitted her tax return for 2018/19. This included an amount in respect of the HICBC, but not the refund she had already received in respect of that year. The return

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

One insufficiency in assessment relating to different errors did not validate the whole assessment for conduct and time limit purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2026
Licence fees were not ‘income’ following the application of the Ramsay principle
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2025
Reasonable excuse was no defence against discovery assessments
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2025
HMRC could not pursue an alternative argument so close to a substantive appeal hearing
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021
Accommodation and travel expenses to hotel nearer to work were not allowable
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2021