This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Discovery provisions did not apply for the purpose of assessing the high income child benefit charge

By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021

The discovery provisions could not be inferred to cover any shortfall in income tax, and HMRC could not fairly be described as having discovered there was income that had not been assessed, but rather it has been discovered that the taxpayer should have paid the high income child benefit charge. 

The taxpayer’s wife was entitled to and received child benefit. The taxpayer’s adjusted net income for tax purposes exceeded £50,000 and was greater than his wife’s income. The taxpayer did not submit a tax return, and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) did not issue a notice to file.  

HMRC considered that the taxpayer was liable to the HICBC for the tax years in question that had not been assessed. The taxpayer was not charged a ‘failure to notify’ penalty, as HMRC

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tribunal refused HMRC’s application for taxpayer’s appeal to be struck out
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
Permission given for individual who was not the nominated partner in a partnership to make late appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
Tribunal was correct in directing HMRC to issue closure notice for enquiry opened in 2014
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2024
Discovery assessments in respect of contractor EBT loan arrangements were validly made
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021
Qualified accountant’s tax return error was ‘careless’ but not ‘deliberate’ for penalty purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021