This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Discovery provisions did not apply for the purpose of assessing the high income child benefit charge

By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021

The discovery provisions could not be inferred to cover any shortfall in income tax, and HMRC could not fairly be described as having discovered there was income that had not been assessed, but rather it has been discovered that the taxpayer should have paid the high income child benefit charge. 

The taxpayer’s wife was entitled to and received child benefit. The taxpayer’s adjusted net income for tax purposes exceeded £50,000 and was greater than his wife’s income. The taxpayer did not submit a tax return, and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) did not issue a notice to file.  

HMRC considered that the taxpayer was liable to the HICBC for the tax years in question that had not been assessed. The taxpayer was not charged a ‘failure to notify’ penalty, as HMRC

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tribunal awards costs against HMRC for unreasonable behaviour but in reduced amount
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
Mistaken belief about tax position was a reasonable excuse in appeal against late payment penalties
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2025
Filing delay exacerbated by HMRC’s electronic communications was reasonable excuse for late tax return
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2025
Late filing penalties upheld as tax return filing notice did not need to be issued by an HMRC officer
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2024
Fish and chip shop owner overclaimed a deduction for purchases
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021