This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Expenditure on preparatory work was ineligible for capital allowances

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2026

Capital allowances were not available for expenditure incurred on a variety of studies (including surveys) carried out in the years before wind farms became operational. 

The respondent companies (Orsted) owned and operated offshore wind farms. They claimed capital allowances on expenditure incurred on a variety of studies (including surveys) undertaken as part of the environment impact assessment carried out before the windfarms became operational. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) denied the allowances. Orsted appealed. The FTT concluded that Orsted were entitled to capital allowances in relation to some of the costs of the studies. HMRC appealed. The Upper Tribunal held that Orsted could not claim capital allowances. However, the Court of Appeal allowed Orsted’s subsequent appeal and&nbsp

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Company was entitled to deductions for expenditure in connection with accountancy practice clients
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
Expenditure on warehouse conversion to a car showroom attracted business property renovation allowances
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2025
Company was not a loan relationship debtor and no loan was made to a participator
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Presumption of continuity applied in determining taxable profits
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2020
Company directors were liable for tax not paid by company
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020