This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Expenditure on preparatory work was ineligible for capital allowances

By Mark McLaughlin, June 2026

Capital allowances were not available for expenditure incurred on a variety of studies (including surveys) carried out in the years before wind farms became operational. 

The respondent companies (Orsted) owned and operated offshore wind farms. They claimed capital allowances on expenditure incurred on a variety of studies (including surveys) undertaken as part of the environment impact assessment carried out before the windfarms became operational. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) denied the allowances. Orsted appealed. The FTT concluded that Orsted were entitled to capital allowances in relation to some of the costs of the studies. HMRC appealed. The Upper Tribunal held that Orsted could not claim capital allowances. However, the Court of Appeal allowed Orsted’s subsequent appeal and&nbsp

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Goodwill amortisation on company’s acquisition of care homes was overstated
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2025
HMRC did not have the right to tax payments under the UK/Canada double tax treaty
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2025
Company was not a loan relationship debtor and no loan was made to a participator
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Information about professional advice was not reasonably required by HMRC to determine if penalties were due
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021
Deductions not available under the replacement of tools provisions for replacement tractor units and trailers
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2019