This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Expenditure was not subsidised and was not incurred in activities contracted out to the company

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025

Expenditure was not ‘subsidised expenditure’ for research and development relief purposes, and the expenditure was not incurred by the company in carrying on activities which were contracted out to it by any person. 

Summary 

Expenditure was not ‘subsidised expenditure’ for research and development (R&D) relief purposes, and the expenditure was not incurred by the company in carrying on activities which were contracted out to it by any person. 

Background 

The appellant company (C), a specialist refurbishment and fit-out contractor, provided specified works to clients for an agreed price. The terms and conditions between C and the clients were set out in construction contracts. Many projects involved taking concept designs through to construction. C agreed to undertake the financial and development risk in delivering the project. Sometimes during the

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Expenditure on preparatory work was eligible for capital allowances
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025
HMRC did not have the right to tax payments under the UK/Canada double tax treaty
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2025
Relief only available on part of company's expenditure
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2021
Deductions not available under the replacement of tools provisions for replacement tractor units and trailers
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2019
Company Advances Amounted To Loan Relationships
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2018