This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Expenditure was not subsidised and was not incurred in activities contracted out to the company

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025

Expenditure was not ‘subsidised expenditure’ for research and development relief purposes, and the expenditure was not incurred by the company in carrying on activities which were contracted out to it by any person. 

Summary 

Expenditure was not ‘subsidised expenditure’ for research and development (R&D) relief purposes, and the expenditure was not incurred by the company in carrying on activities which were contracted out to it by any person. 

Background 

The appellant company (C), a specialist refurbishment and fit-out contractor, provided specified works to clients for an agreed price. The terms and conditions between C and the clients were set out in construction contracts. Many projects involved taking concept designs through to construction. C agreed to undertake the financial and development risk in delivering the project. Sometimes during the

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Partnership business acquired by company was carried on before 1 April 2002
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026
Payments under settlement agreements with industry regulators were non-deductible
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2023
Delays in obtaining trust deed from trustees was not a reasonable excuse
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Company was not a loan relationship debtor and no loan was made to a participator
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Satellite launch costs were not eligible for capital allowances
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021