This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

First-tier Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider validity of PPN in a penalty appeal

By Mark McLaughlin, July 2020

The First-tier Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine the validity of a partnership payment notice in penalty proceedings. 

The appellant participated in a tax avoidance scheme through a limited liability partnership (LLP) involved in investments in films, in the year ended 5 April 2005. The LLP entered into DOTAS arrangements (for the purposes of FA 2014, s 219(5)) by which it claimed a trading loss for that (and other) years.  

The appellant claimed, as a partner of the LLP, to carry back his share of that loss to reduce his taxable income for the tax year ended 5 April 2002. He obtained a tax repayment from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) of approximately £100,000, calculated by reference to income tax he originally paid for that tax year. HMRC enquired into the LLP's tax return for (among other years) the tax year ending 5 April 2005, and in November 2012 issued the LLP with a closure notice reducing the LLP's trading loss to

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

First-tier Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to consider validity of PPN in a penalty appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2020
Mixed partnership rules applied to a partner on profits allocated to a company
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2020
Assessments of additional income relating to suppressed takings confirmed
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020
Film and video production LLPs were not trading
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2019
Payment To Settle Litigation Was Not Wholly And Exclusively For The Profession Or Trade
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2018