This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Follower and accelerated payment notices were both quashed

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2019

The Court of Appeal allowed the taxpayer’s appeal and quashed a follower notice and accelerated payment notice, as HMRC misdirected themselves in certain respects when deciding to give him the follower notice. 

In early 2000, a trust established by the taxpayer for the benefit of himself and his family held shares in a company. A plan developed to merge the company with another company and to list shares in the new company on the London stock exchange. 

To avoid capital gains tax on disposal of the shares held by the trustees, a scheme was devised pursuant to which the existing Jersey trustees resigned in favour of trustees resident in Mauritius. The Mauritian trustees became shareholders in the new company. The new company was floated in August 2000, and all the shares that the trust held in the company were sold in the course of the floatation. Subsequently, UK

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Follower notices: lack of corrective action was reasonable in all the circumstances
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2022
Information requested in notices was reasonably required and HMRC had reason to suspect loss of tax
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2022
Limited Liability Partnership Was Not A Partnership For Tax Return Filing Notice Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2018
Executor Not Liable To Penalties For Late Filing Of Estate Tax Returns
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2017
Self-Employment Income Was Not Suppressed
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2015