This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Follower and accelerated payment notices were both quashed

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2019

The Court of Appeal allowed the taxpayer’s appeal and quashed a follower notice and accelerated payment notice, as HMRC misdirected themselves in certain respects when deciding to give him the follower notice. 

In early 2000, a trust established by the taxpayer for the benefit of himself and his family held shares in a company. A plan developed to merge the company with another company and to list shares in the new company on the London stock exchange. 

To avoid capital gains tax on disposal of the shares held by the trustees, a scheme was devised pursuant to which the existing Jersey trustees resigned in favour of trustees resident in Mauritius. The Mauritian trustees became shareholders in the new company. The new company was floated in August 2000, and all the shares that the trust held in the company were sold in the course of the floatation. Subsequently, UK

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

HMRC Did Not Prove That Tax Return Filing Notices Were Sent To Taxpayer
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2018
Parents’ Illness And Death Were Reasonable Excuses For Late Filing Penalty Purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2017
Penalties Were Due For Late Accelerated Partner Payments
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2017
No Decision On Whether Penalties Applied To Class 4 NIC
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2017
LLP Members Entitled To Declare Different Profit Shares Than ‘Incorrect’ Amounts On Partnership Return
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2016