This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC Not Required To Delete Work Product Resulting From Material Provided Following Information Notice

By Mark McLaughlin, January 2019

A company unsuccessfully appealed against the High Court’s refusal of a judicial review application following HMRC’s refusal to delete work product derived from material provided by the company pursuant to an information notice.

In November 2012, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) served what they considered to be an information notice on a company (PML) (pursuant to FA 2008, Sch 36, para 1). HMRC did not consider the response to be a proper compliance and levied an initial penalty and then daily penalties.

PML appealed. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) ([2015] UKFTT 440 (TC)) held that the information notice was invalid, and the penalties were therefore not enforceable, as the FTT considered that it related to the tax position of PML's clients (for which a third-party notice would be necessary) and not PML itself. The FTT noted that it had no power to require HMRC to return the documents provided by PML pursuant to the notice but expressed the opinion

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tax-related penalty for non-compliance with an information notice upheld
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2022
APN regime applied to regulation 80 determinations for PAYE purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2022
Capital allowances claims were not out of time following tax return enquiries
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2019
Company Was Not Entitled To Compound Interest From HMRC
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2018
Capital Allowances Claims Were Not Out Of Time Following Tax Return Enquiries
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2018