This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC’s allocation of tax payments was not unreasonable

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2020

The appellant’s self-assessment return for the tax year 2010/11 was filed on 31 January 2012. His tax liability for the year was due to be paid on or before 10 February 2012 (in accordance with TMA 1970, s 59B(3). However, the tax was not paid in full until 3 March 2015. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) issued late payment penalty FA 2009, Sch 56, para 3).   

The appellant requested a review of HMRC’s decision, saying his 2010/11 tax payment was made on time. The payment had been allocated to penalties from previous years. The appellant was not happy that HMRC allocated the payment to penalties. The review upheld HMRC’s decision. The appellant appealed. 

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) observed that the appellant’s balancing payment of £1,010 was due to be paid on 10 February 2012. He made a payment of £1,010 on 5 May 2012, over two

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Preconditions for making a discovery assessment were satisfied
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2022
Losses arising from the non-purchase of land plots were not allowable
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2019
Follower and accelerated payment notices were both quashed
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2019
HMRC Did Not Prove That Tax Return Filing Notices Were Sent To Taxpayer
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2018
First-tier Tribunal Had Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Third Party Information Notice
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2016