This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC’s interpretation of extra-statutory concession B18 was preferred

By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021

The High Court held that HMRC’s interpretation of extra-statutory concession B18 was to be preferred to the claimants’, and that the benefit of the concession was restricted to the extent that the payment was out of income which arose to the trustees not earlier than six years before the end of the tax year in which the payment was made. 

The claimants were the UK resident beneficiaries of an unapproved retirement benefit scheme established by a company of which they were directors. The trustees, who were Guernsey resident for tax purposes, received UK source interest, on which they paid income tax. 

In September 2018, the claimants’ accountants wrote to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) seeking confirmation that extra-statutory concession 

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Transactions involving use of offshore credit card to make UK purchases did not amount to taxable remittance
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2026
Upper Tribunal refused taxpayer’s application to appeal against decisions of the First-tier Tribunal
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2025
Taxpayer’s misinterpretation of HMRC letter did not constitute a reasonable excuse
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Football agent’s fees paid on behalf of a professional footballer were not deductible expenses
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2024
Discovery assessments brought about by the carelessness of the taxpayer’s agent
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2023