This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

HMRC’s interpretation of extra-statutory concession B18 was preferred

By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021

The High Court held that HMRC’s interpretation of extra-statutory concession B18 was to be preferred to the claimants’, and that the benefit of the concession was restricted to the extent that the payment was out of income which arose to the trustees not earlier than six years before the end of the tax year in which the payment was made. 

The claimants were the UK resident beneficiaries of an unapproved retirement benefit scheme established by a company of which they were directors. The trustees, who were Guernsey resident for tax purposes, received UK source interest, on which they paid income tax. 

In September 2018, the claimants’ accountants wrote to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) seeking confirmation that extra-statutory concession 

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Companies did not meet eligibility requirements for EIS relief
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2025
HMRC’s persistence in contending the taxpayer had been careless was unreasonable
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2024
The later of two dividends was due and payable when it was paid
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
HMRC assessment must be reduced to take account of materials
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2020
Adjustments made to partners’ personal tax returns were not closure notices
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2020