This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Individual liable to SDLT despite relief being available as no claim was made

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2025

An individual was liable to SDLT where an assignment of a property purchase contract was made to a company, notwithstanding that the company paid SDLT on the purchase following an assignment of the contract and relief would have been available to the individual but was not claimed.  

An individual (GG) entered into a contract to purchase a property in London on 19 April 2018 for £1,450,000. The completion date was 24 May 2018. A company (GGL) was incorporated, with GG as the sole shareholder and director. On 31 May 2018, GG assigned the purchase contract to GGL, which completed the purchase on 5 June 2018. GGL submitted an SDLT return and paid stamp duty land tax (SDLT) of £132,250. On 5 December 2018, GGL’s SDLT return was amended, and multiple dwellings relief (MDR) was claimed. Following a subsequent enquiry, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) refused the MDR claim on the basis that the contract had been substantially performed on 20

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tax: Refund of higher rate LTT was not due as claim was made after the deadline
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2025
Partly completed development was residential property at the effective date of the transaction
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025
Property bought jointly with daughter was liable to LTT at the higher rates
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2023
It was not ‘reasonable in all the circumstances’ not to take corrective action
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021
Company acquired a residential property for development purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021