This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Information was not reasonably required to check the appellants’ tax positions

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2022

Information requested by HMRC in information notices was not considered to be ‘reasonably’ required on the particular facts of the case, as the First-tier Tribunal did not consider any useful purpose would be achieved by prolonging matters by ordering information notices to be complied with before any tribunal proceedings.

The appellants were the sole director and a shareholder (JY) of a company and its secretary and a shareholder (PY). On 12 July 2012, PY transferred 100 ‘B’ shares in the company to JY’s father (GY), a resident of Cyprus.

The company subsequently paid the following dividends: (1) 4 January 2013 – £200,000 to;

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Discovery assessments were validly made due to careless advice by the taxpayer’s agent
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2020
Homeless taxpayer had a reasonable excuse for filing his tax return late
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2019
Tax Return Enquiry Closure Notices Could Be Given To Deceased’s Personal Representatives
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2018
Estimated Assessments And Penalties For Failure To Notify Were Justified
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2017
HMRC’s Decision Not To Suspend Penalty For Careless Error Was Flawed
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2016