This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Information was not reasonably required to check the appellants’ tax positions

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2022

Information requested by HMRC in information notices was not considered to be ‘reasonably’ required on the particular facts of the case, as the First-tier Tribunal did not consider any useful purpose would be achieved by prolonging matters by ordering information notices to be complied with before any tribunal proceedings.

The appellants were the sole director and a shareholder (JY) of a company and its secretary and a shareholder (PY). On 12 July 2012, PY transferred 100 ‘B’ shares in the company to JY’s father (GY), a resident of Cyprus.

The company subsequently paid the following dividends: (1) 4 January 2013 – £200,000 to;

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Discovery assessments were not made to HMRC’s best judgment
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2019
Information Notice: Documents Were ‘Reasonably Required’ To Check Taxpayer’s Tax Position
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2016
Information Notice Items Were Not In The Nature Of A HMRC ‘Fishing Expedition’
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2015
Penalty For Late Payments Of PAYE: No Reasonable Excuse And No Special Circumstances
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2015
HMRC’s Treatment Of Partnership Return Containing Error Was Reasonable Excuse For Subsequent Late Filing
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2014