This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

It was not ‘reasonable in all the circumstances’ not to take corrective action

By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021

The Upper Tribunal overturned the First-tier Tribunal’s decision in the taxpayer company’s appeal against a penalty notice for not taking corrective action in response to a follower notice but reduced the penalty rate.  

The respondent company participated in a stamp duty land tax (SDLT) avoidance arrangement involving the purchase of a property in August 2011. No SDLT was paid on the property purchase. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) opened an enquiry into the land transaction return. Subsequently, other cases were heard by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) about similar schemes. The scheme was found not to work. HMRC treated a decision released in February 2017 as the final judicial ruling relevant to the arrangements. 

In September 2017, HMRC sent the company a follower notice

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Public right of way was not part of the grounds of a house for SDLT purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2026
Annexe to main house was suitable for use as a separate dwelling and multiple dwellings relief applied
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026
Company’s acquisition of residential property was liable to higher rate of SDLT and no exclusions applied
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2025
Main house and annex did not each count as a dwelling for multiple dwellings relief purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Residential property: Property was not ‘mixed use’ but entirely residential
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020