This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Judicial review application following HMRC’s notification of intention to publish information on tax avoidance scheme refused

By Mark McLaughlin, November 2023

In September 2022, HMRC wrote to the claimant companies (in accordance with FA 2022, s 86(5)) notifying the claimants that HMRC intended to publish certain information about the claimants concerning a tax avoidance scheme and inviting them to make representations within 30 days. Each claimant exercised its right to make representations. Subsequently, the claimants applied to the High Court for permission for judicial review of the defendant’s decision to list them under FA 2022, s 86. HMRC considered that the scheme created an artificial separation of part of the contractual remuneration paid by an employer to an employee, one part being salary and the other part being described as an ‘option payment’. The mechanism by which the separation supposedly produced a tax saving was that the ‘option payment’ element was purportedly not subject to employer deductions for income tax and National Insurance contributions from the option payment.  <>

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Public law issues were not relevant to appeal against CIS determination
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2024
Computer and clerical error were not reasonable excuses for the late filing of a corporation tax return
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2022
Relief only available on part of company's expenditure
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2021
Injury of company’s sole director was not a reasonable excuse to admit a late appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021
Company directors were liable for tax not paid by company
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020