This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Late filing penalties were proportionate even though no tax was due

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2019

Late filing penalties were not disproportionate in respect of self-assessment returns for tax years for which no tax was ultimately due, so such a circumstance could not be a special circumstance when considering whether a reduction in the penalties was justified. 

The appellant was charged penalties by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for the late filing of his self-assessment returns for the tax years 2010/11, 2012/13 and 2013/14 (under FA 2009, Sch 55). HMRC’s calculations for the tax years in question showed that no tax was due for any of those years. 

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the penalties. The appellant appealed to the Upper Tribunal (UT). His grounds of appeal were: (1) The FTT was not entitled to find as a fact that notices to file were sent to him so HMRC had not discharged their burden of demonstrating that

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Loss entries in tax return did not amount to the discovery of an insufficiency
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2019
No Right Of Appeal Against Rejection Of Late Overpayment Relief Repayment Claim
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2018
HMRC’s Refusal To Suspend Penalty For Careless Tax Return Errors Was Flawed
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2017
Discovery Was Made Which Was Not ‘Stale’ And Reasonable Awareness Test Of Insufficiency Of Tax Was Satisfied
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2016
Tribunal Could Consider An Issue Not Given As A Reason For Conclusion In HMRC Closure Notice
By Mark McLaughlin, January 2016