This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Legal expenses were wholly and exclusively for the purposes of a partnership’s trade

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2022

Expenses incurred defending one of the partners of the partnership against a criminal charge was incurred wholly and exclusively for the business of the partnership.

The appellants (parents and adult son) were partners in a scrap metal business. A police operation was conducted, which involved undercover police attempting to sell (and in some cases selling) property which the police implied was stolen property but which in fact was not stolen, as it was the property of the police.

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Agent and webmaster expenses claims by adult entertainer denied
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2019
Travel Expenses Of Exotic Dancer Not Deductible But Other Expenses Allowable
By Mark McLaughlin, December 2018
Sideways Loss Relief Available As Trade Was Commercial
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2018
Son’s Wages Were Not A Deductible Business Expense
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2018
Farm Trading ‘Sideways’ Loss Relief Not Available
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2016