This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

No trading deduction allowed for interest paid by partners rather than by the partnership

By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020

Interest incurred on loans made to two interest in possession settlements in the Isle of Man, where the loans were ultimately used in a trade carried on by a partnership between the two settlements, was not deductible from partnership trading profits. 

The appellants, UK resident property developers, used a tax avoidance scheme. In April 2005, each appellant created a settlement in the Isle of Man (IOM), the trustees of which were IOM companies. The trustees entered into a partnership in the IOM (‘Redwood’). Each partner was entitled on behalf of its settlement to 50% of the profits of Redwood. In May 2005, the trustees entered into loan agreements with a third-party lender. The monies advanced under each loan agreement were used by Redwood towards purchasing a property. 

The appellants initially contended that they were not liable to

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Pension scheme withdrawals were subject to double tax relief in the UK
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2025
Trade was carried on commercially but not with a view to the realisation of profits
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2025
Taxpayer’s misinterpretation of HMRC letter did not constitute a reasonable excuse
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
First-tier Tribunal erred in law and HMRC’s discovery assessment was invalid
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020
Construction industry scheme: Special purpose property development company payments were subject to the CIS
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2020