This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Non-trading activities were a substantial part of a company’s overall activities

By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025

A company preparing to carry on or start a trade was nevertheless not a trading company for entrepreneurs’ relief purposes because non-trading activities were a substantial part of the company’s overall activities. 

Summary 

A company preparing to carry on or start a trade was nevertheless not a trading company for entrepreneurs’ relief (ER) purposes because non-trading activities were a substantial part of the company’s overall activities. 

Background 

The appellants (TE, ZM and CP) were directors of a company (PSSL) from incorporation in 2011. In 2016, PSSL acquired a property. Previously, PSSL had made a loan to an unrelated third party (the original property owner) to enable the original property owner to acquire the property. PSSL acquired the property after the original property owner was unable to service the loan and interest. 

PSSL

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Company was not the subsidiary of a trading group
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2025
Taxpayer entitled to entrepreneurs’ relief as LLP had commenced trading
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2024
Appeal was not made on time and permission to make late appeal refused
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2023
Individuals were required to be settlement beneficiaries for a one-year period
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2021
Writing Off Part Of Qualifying Loan Created Allowable Loss
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2018