This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

One of the taxpayer company’s grounds for appealing a First-tier Tribunal decision in an IR35 case was refused

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026

The Upper Tribunal refused the taxpayer company permission to appeal against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal in an IR35 case on one of the three grounds it advanced but accepted the other two grounds.    

The respondent (and applicant) was the personal service company of an ex-professional footballer (BR). BR acted as an ‘ambassador’ for Manchester United Football Club (MUFC) under an ‘ambassador agreement’, which contained various terms dealing with image rights. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) considered that the intermediaries legislation (IR35) applied to all monies paid under the ambassador agreement. 

The First-tier Tribunal ([2025] UKFTT 56 (TC)) determined two issues. The first (the ‘IR35 decision’)

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Loans paid to taxpayer as part of contractor loan scheme were taxable as employment income
By Andrew Needham, April 2026
Personal expenses paid through a director’s loan account represented an extraction of value
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2024
Subsistence expenses paid to employees were within the scope of a dispensation
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2023
Discovery assessments in respect of contractor EBT loan arrangements were validly made
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2021
Information letter about high-income child benefit charge received before child’s birth was not a reasonable excuse for failing to notify the charge
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021