This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

One of the taxpayer company’s grounds for appealing a First-tier Tribunal decision in an IR35 case was refused

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026

The Upper Tribunal refused the taxpayer company permission to appeal against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal in an IR35 case on one of the three grounds it advanced but accepted the other two grounds.    

The respondent (and applicant) was the personal service company of an ex-professional footballer (BR). BR acted as an ‘ambassador’ for Manchester United Football Club (MUFC) under an ‘ambassador agreement’, which contained various terms dealing with image rights. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) considered that the intermediaries legislation (IR35) applied to all monies paid under the ambassador agreement. 

The First-tier Tribunal ([2025] UKFTT 56 (TC)) determined two issues. The first (the ‘IR35 decision’)

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Follower notice penalties upheld as the taxpayer’s failure to take corrective action was not reasonable
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2026
Mistaken belief about tax position was a reasonable excuse in appeal against late payment penalties
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2025
Discovery assessment was validly made and taxpayer’s case prepared using AI did not give grounds to allow an appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2025
Travel and subsistence payments on changes in work locations were taxable
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020
Fixed protection notice applications submitted late were rejected
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2020