This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Partly completed development was residential property at the effective date of the transaction

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025

A building which was in the process of being constructed or adapted for use as a dwelling at the effective date of the transaction fell within the definition of residential property and was subject to the higher residential rates of stamp duty land tax. 

On 24 May 2021, the appellant purchased a property (EP), together with a property which backed onto EP (EM). He submitted a stamp duty land tax (SDLT) return and paid SDLT on the basis that the property was residential. On 18 October 2021, the appellant’s agents submitted a claim for SDLT overpaid on the basis that the appellant had purchased non-residential property. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) refused the claim on the basis that the original classification of the property as residential was correct as the building was in the process of being constructed or adapted for use as a dwelling at the effective date of the transaction (EDT). The appellant appealed.  

EP and EM (E) was previously

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Tax: Refund of higher rate LTT was not due as claim was made after the deadline
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2025
Multiple dwellings relief available on two dwellings purchased as a single property
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2024
Acquisitions of freehold property and right to use nearby communal gardens were not linked transactions
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
Company acquired a residential property for development purposes
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021
Property and basement annex did not each count as a dwelling
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2020