This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Partly completed development was residential property at the effective date of the transaction

By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025

A building which was in the process of being constructed or adapted for use as a dwelling at the effective date of the transaction fell within the definition of residential property and was subject to the higher residential rates of stamp duty land tax. 

On 24 May 2021, the appellant purchased a property (EP), together with a property which backed onto EP (EM). He submitted a stamp duty land tax (SDLT) return and paid SDLT on the basis that the property was residential. On 18 October 2021, the appellant’s agents submitted a claim for SDLT overpaid on the basis that the appellant had purchased non-residential property. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) refused the claim on the basis that the original classification of the property as residential was correct as the building was in the process of being constructed or adapted for use as a dwelling at the effective date of the transaction (EDT). The appellant appealed.  

EP and EM (E) was previously

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Individual liable to SDLT despite relief being available as no claim was made
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2025
Dwelling in need of renovation and repair on acquisition was suitable for use as a single dwelling
By Arthur Weller, December 2024
Application to admit an appeal submitted 42 days late accepted by tribunal
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2023
Contingent consideration: Part of the consideration for a land transaction was contingent
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021
Follower notice: Penalty for failure to take corrective action set aside
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2020