This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Partnership’s activities did not amount to a trade

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2022

The Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal was entitled to conclude that the activities of a general partnership did not amount to a trade for the purposes of ‘sideways’ loss relief for its members.

The appellant general partnership (‘Foundation’) was established in July 2008. Its initial partners were an individual (TL) and a company, which was a subsidiary of another company. In 2007, TL became aware of ‘Project Adriatic’, an informal co-venture between third party investors to construct a hotel, residential apartments and a trade fair in Montenegro.  

Foundation was formed to be an investment vehicle into which investors would subscribe. It was intended that investors would be able to set sideways any trading loss realised by Foundation against the investors’ own taxable income. TL had hoped that Foundation would raise £25m from external investors. However, by 3 April 2009, it had

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Taxpayer’s successful challenge to the disclosure of certain documents to another taxpayer overturned
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2023
Dividends declared but withheld and unpaid were not taxable income
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2023
LLPs were trading and were carrying on a trade with a view to profit
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2021
Shares carried a preferential right to dividends
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2021
LLPs entitled to EZAs based on apportionment to determine expenditure on the relevant interests in buildings
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2021