This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Replacement discovery assessments did not displace previous assessments

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021

A second set of discovery assessments were not validly issued, as an earlier set of discovery assessments relating to the same discovery had been issued, but HMRC withdrew its appeal against them due to technical flaws, and the First-tier Tribunal had allowed the appellant’s appeal. 

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) received information alleging that the appellant’s employer (DAL) had been paying off-payroll cash bonuses to its employees and providing them with prestige company cars without declaring the provision of benefits for income tax and National Insurance contributions purposes. Consequently, HMRC visited DAL’s premises in September 2014. HMRC was provided with a spreadsheet showing cars allocated to individual employees, including a Range Rover Sport allocated to the appellant. 

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Loans paid to taxpayer as part of contractor loan scheme were taxable as employment income
By Andrew Needham, April 2026
Company applied incorrect methodology in its calculation of support payment claims
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2025
Taxpayer acquired a domicile of origin or dependency in England
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2025
Arrangements for issue of shares were disqualifying so authority to issue SEIS compliance certificates refused
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2024
Legal and insurance costs in a settlement agreement were employment income of police officer
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2021