This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Salary sacrifice was binding contractually and subsistence payments were round sum allowances

By Mark McLaughlin, February 2025

A salary sacrifice was a valid and binding contractual term, and subsistence payments under the scheme were round sum allowances, but the mileage payments and public transport payments under the scheme were not. 

A dispute arose between the appellants and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) about the income tax and National Insurance contributions (NICs) implications of payments made by the appellant under a salary sacrifice scheme made available to the appellant’s employees whose salaries generally exceeded the national minimum wage by £1, in respect of three categories of travel and subsistence expenses payments over the four tax years 2012/13 to 2015/16 inclusive: (1) payments in respect of mileage undertaken by participants in going to and from their temporary places of work by car, motorcycle or bicycle; (2) payments in respect of expenses incurred by participants in going to and from their temporary places of work by public transport; and (3)

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Coronavirus job retention scheme: CJRS payments were not due as director continued working during furlough
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2025
Personal expenses paid through a director’s loan account represented an extraction of value
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2024
HMRC’s decision to impose late payment penalties was flawed
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2024
Supreme Court quashed HMRC follower notice
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2021
HMRC letter rejecting double tax relief claim was not part of a formal enquiry
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2021