This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Sales of three residential properties in consecutive tax years were not eligible for relief

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020

The disposal of three residential properties in three consecutive tax years did not attract principal private residence relief as the taxpayer’s occupation of the properties did not have the necessary degree of permanence, continuity or expectation of continuity on the balance of probabilities.

Summary

The disposal of three residential properties in three consecutive tax years did not attract principal private residence relief as the taxpayer’s occupation of the properties did not have the necessary degree of permanence, continuity or expectation of continuity on the balance of probabilities.

Background

During the period 2013 to 2015 the appellant bought and sold at least five properties, three of which (‘CL’, ‘MC’, and ‘FC’) were solely owned; the other two properties were jointly owned.

The appellant purchased CL on 28 March 2013 for £125,000;

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Share exchange did not form part of arrangements with a main purpose of CGT avoidance
By Mark McLaughlin, November 2023
HMRC’s calculation of penalties was incorrect
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2022
Pre-trading activities were not a ‘business’ of a partnership
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2021
Cumulative preference shares were ‘ordinary share capital’ 2021
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021
No goodwill existed on a business transfer upon incorporation
By Mark McLaughlin, May 2020