This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Sales of three residential properties in consecutive tax years were not eligible for relief

By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020

The disposal of three residential properties in three consecutive tax years did not attract principal private residence relief as the taxpayer’s occupation of the properties did not have the necessary degree of permanence, continuity or expectation of continuity on the balance of probabilities.

Summary

The disposal of three residential properties in three consecutive tax years did not attract principal private residence relief as the taxpayer’s occupation of the properties did not have the necessary degree of permanence, continuity or expectation of continuity on the balance of probabilities.

Background

During the period 2013 to 2015 the appellant bought and sold at least five properties, three of which (‘CL’, ‘MC’, and ‘FC’) were solely owned; the other two properties were jointly owned.

The appellant purchased CL on 28 March 2013 for £125,000;

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Loan notes were not registered in Jersey upon their redemption
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2026
Capital loss relief for loans to traders was due following capitalisation of loan
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2024
Property held on constructive trust for family member
By Mark McLaughlin, July 2024
Share loss relief denied as the shares were already of negligible value when allotted
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2024
Deductions claimed were not allowable and discovery assessments and penalties were upheld
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2023