This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Share exchange was not subject to anti-avoidance provisions

By Mark McLaughlin, August 2021

An exchange of shares for ordinary and preference shares was not subject to anti-avoidance provisions that would have disapplied share-for-share exchange treatment as a reconstruction for the purposes of corporation tax on chargeable gains.  

Summary 

An exchange of shares for ordinary and preference shares was not subject to the anti-avoidance provisions in TCGA 1992, s 137(1) that would have disapplied share-for-share exchange treatment as a reconstruction in TCGA 1992, s 135 for the purposes of corporation tax on chargeable gains. 

Background 

The appellant company (‘E’) was part of a joint venture with another company (‘DL’) and others. Another company (‘DHPLC’) indirectly held 100% of DL.  

E and DL held shares

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Payments under settlement agreements with industry regulators were deductible
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2025
Business and goodwill were not transferred on a later date contended by HMRC
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2023
Compensation settlement receipt was revenue in nature
By Mark McLaughlin, August 2021
Injury of company’s sole director was not a reasonable excuse to admit a late appeal
By Mark McLaughlin, March 2021
Company directors were liable for tax not paid by company
By Mark McLaughlin, September 2020