This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Tax return filing notices need not be issued by a ‘flesh and blood’ HMRC officer

By Mark McLaughlin, March 2020

Penalties for the late filing of tax returns were due as (among other things) notices to file the returns did not need to be identified or issued by an HMRC officer. 

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) charged the taxpayers (NR and CS) penalties for the late filing of tax returns. The taxpayers appealed. The appeals were decided separately by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT).  

The FTT stated that HMRC needed to show that the taxpayers had been required to submit a return in a notice given “by an officer of the Board” and that, if they could not demonstrate this, the penalties would not be due. The FTT considered what it meant for a notice to be given “by an officer of the Board” and concluded there must be evidence that the named officer signed the notice or it must otherwise be made clear that he is "giving" it. However, the notices had been

Subscribe to the McLaughlin’s Tax Case Library to get instant access
to the Tax Case Library.
14 day free trial , 90 day money back guarantee
Subscribe

Related or similar articles

Uncertainty About Whether Receipt Was Taxable Represented Special Circumstances
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2019
Taxpayer Had Reasonable Excuse For Late Filing As HMRC Were Informed Of New Address
By Mark McLaughlin, April 2019
Financial Difficulty Caused By Failure Of Taxpayer’s Company Was Reasonable Excuse For Late Payment Of APN
By Mark McLaughlin, February 2019
Reliance On Agent Was A Reasonable Excuse For Late Filing Of Tax Returns
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2018
Period For Making Accelerated Partner Payments Had Not Ended
By Mark McLaughlin, October 2017